refactor(tests): convert the higher risk slice-to-map table tests

[mwbrooks]

Summary

Related to #315, #316, #320, #321, #322, #323

This pull request refactors the remaining higher risk Table Tests from the Slice-to-Map Pattern. It's focused on tests with OS mocks, HTTP mocks, and nested logic.

Reviewers

This is the last one! Congrats, you've reached the end of the Slice-to-Map Conversion Book 📚

Requirements

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 64.65%. Comparing base (ca9db20) to head (856b3c6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #324      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.66%   64.65%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         212      212              
  Lines       17771    17771              
==========================================
- Hits        11492    11489       -3     
- Misses       5204     5205       +1     
- Partials     1075     1077       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mwbrooks]

note: This naming convention is a little strange, but I decided to keep it 1-to-1 with current implementation.

[mwbrooks]

note: This ---/+++ looks scary, but it's just fixing this test by wrapping each iteration in a t.Run function.

[zimeg]

@mwbrooks This has been such an impressive changeset of refactors to brings tests to a new and better level. Huge thanks for these efforts! 🏆 ✨

[mwbrooks]

Thanks a bunch and appreciate the reviews! They're dry reads but now we have some consistent test formats to use going forward! 🙇🏻