Skip to content

USHIFT-6130 Support prefer-align-cpus-by-uncorecache featureGate#5724

Closed
copejon wants to merge 7 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
copejon:ushift-6130
Closed

USHIFT-6130 Support prefer-align-cpus-by-uncorecache featureGate#5724
copejon wants to merge 7 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
copejon:ushift-6130

Conversation

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

@copejon copejon commented Nov 11, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 11, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: copejon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 11, 2025
This commit introduces a comprehensive document detailing the data flow of the API server configuration, tracing the path from the `apiServer` field in the MicroShift configuration file to its ingestion by the kube-apiserver. It includes a UML sequence diagram illustrating the configuration steps, key data structures, and the transformation of configuration values into command-line flags. Additionally, it updates the configuration structure to support feature gates, enhancing the API server's customization capabilities.
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 14, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

Can we close this PR in favor of #5765 when ready?

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #5765 - closing.
/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Nov 20, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2025

@ggiguash: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Duplicate of #5765 - closing.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@copejon copejon deleted the ushift-6130 branch January 20, 2026 01:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants