Skip to content

Create README.md#2

Merged
cloutiertyler merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
cloutiertyler-patch-1
Jun 20, 2023
Merged

Create README.md#2
cloutiertyler merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
cloutiertyler-patch-1

Conversation

@cloutiertyler
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Changes

API

  • This is a breaking change to the module API
  • This is a breaking change to the ClientAPI

If the API is breaking, please state below what will break

Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler merged commit 9803c09 into master Jun 20, 2023
@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler deleted the cloutiertyler-patch-1 branch August 1, 2023 21:54
Centril added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
bfops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
bfops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
* Upgraded module to 0.12

* 0.12 upgrade is working

* Fixes

* Fixed some server warnings

* Small fix

* Apply suggestions from code review

* Update Cargo.toml

* Package upgraded to 0.12.0

* Renamed SampleScene => Main

---------

Co-authored-by: John Detter <no-reply@boppygames.gg>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Cloutier <cloutiertyler@users.noreply.github.com>
bfops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
bfops pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
# Description of Changes

<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->

Copied from: #4084

We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.

Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.

# API and ABI breaking changes

<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->

None

# Expected complexity level and risk

1 - this is just a version upgrade

<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->

# Testing

<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->

The testsuite failures are fixed by
#4120

- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes

---------

Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
# Description of Changes

<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->

Copied from: #4084

We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.

Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.

# API and ABI breaking changes

<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->

None

# Expected complexity level and risk

1 - this is just a version upgrade

<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->

# Testing

<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->

The testsuite failures are fixed by
#4120

- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes

---------

Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
# Description of Changes

<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->

Copied from: #4084

We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.

Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.

# API and ABI breaking changes

<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->

None

# Expected complexity level and risk

1 - this is just a version upgrade

<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->

# Testing

<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->

The testsuite failures are fixed by
#4120

- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes

---------

Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
# Description of Changes

<!-- Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on
here. -->

Copied from: #4084

We originally reverted this because it was causing testsuite flakes in
private. Now we have solved the issue that was causing the flakes so
this should be safe to merge.

Version upgrade to `v1.12.0`.

# API and ABI breaking changes

<!-- If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label. -->

None

# Expected complexity level and risk

1 - this is just a version upgrade

<!--
How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1
to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex
change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in
the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning
ways. -->

# Testing

<!-- Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your
reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected! -->

The testsuite failures are fixed by
#4120

- [x] License has been properly updated including version number and
date
- [x] CI passes

---------

Co-authored-by: John Detter <4099508+jdetter@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rekhoff <r.ekhoff@clockworklabs.io>
Co-authored-by: clockwork-labs-bot <clockwork-labs-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant