gshift cannot eval variables used in [#5548
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
I'm confused about adding raw support in this PR, is there a reason to do that here instead of as a separate PR? |
Good point. I initially thought that adding |
Oh, I see. I edited the PR description with my understanding. It's fine to keep the change in this PR IIUC. |
|
Fixed the trivial bits. Pending things are:
|
|
Done. I hope the new NEWS item reflects the changes enough. |
|
Great work! |
|
Remarking just that if this PR closes #5547, taking into account #5680 (comment)
then it also closes #5680 (which is currently open) |
Closes #5547
Closes #5543
Closes #5541
rawsupport forshiftto parallel the same support ingshift