Eta rho pairs

[JMGilbert]

These are the local changes I made to run the latest specifications of dscim for integration. These need to accompany one minor change to dscim-cil: change the datatype of eta_rhos in run_result.py to a list of lists of the form eta_rhos = [[eta1,rho1],[eta2,rho2],...]. They were previously of the form eta_rhos = {eta1: rho1, eta2: rho2, ...}.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dscim-v0.4.0@57ee5eb). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             dscim-v0.4.0      #65   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   43.03%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?       18           
  Lines                   ?     1731           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?      745           
  Misses                  ?      986           
  Partials                ?        0           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[kemccusker]

Do we want these to be np.power instead?

[kemccusker]

@JMGilbert this looks reasonable - please check the suggestion to update to np.power but otherwise I think it's ready, if tests are passing. I didn't check all the math line-by-line though. Would be good to get @davidrzhdu's review as well.

[kemccusker]

These are the local changes I made to run the latest specifications of dscim for integration. These need to accompany one minor change to dscim-cil: change the datatype of eta_rhos in run_result.py to a list of lists of the form eta_rhos = [[eta1,rho1],[eta2,rho2],...].

@JMGilbert can you add to the PR description from what datatype/structure you changed eta_rhos?