@Mark-Simulacrum I want to ensure I'm reading the report correctly, as different measures give conflicting results.
| measure |
before (total) |
after (total) |
change |
| cpu-clock |
372185.29 |
369019.14 |
-0.85% |
| cycles:u |
1421498864061 |
1409937857765 |
-0.81% |
| faults |
1511256 |
1510959 |
-0.02% |
| instructions:u |
1699836885596 |
1723213735874 |
+1.38% |
| max-rss |
16735048 |
16739924 |
+0.03% |
| task-clock |
370849.03 |
367449.54 |
-0.92% |
| wall-time |
202.36 |
203.21 |
+0.42% |
If we judge by "instructions", there is a significant regression, but if we judge by "cpu-clock" or "cycles", there is a signficant improvement.
Originally posted by @kennytm in rust-lang/rust#45282 (comment)
@Mark-Simulacrum I want to ensure I'm reading the report correctly, as different measures give conflicting results.
If we judge by "instructions", there is a significant regression, but if we judge by "cpu-clock" or "cycles", there is a signficant improvement.
Originally posted by @kennytm in rust-lang/rust#45282 (comment)