Skip to content

Release 26.1 docs for Cloud#540

Merged
JakeSCahill merged 7 commits intomainfrom
26.1
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Release 26.1 docs for Cloud#540
JakeSCahill merged 7 commits intomainfrom
26.1

Conversation

@JakeSCahill
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Resolves https://github.com/redpanda-data/documentation-private/issues/
Review deadline:

Page previews

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

#537)

* DOC01606 Document Cloud Feature Support ordered rack region preference for leader pinning

* style edit

* Apply suggestion from @JakeSCahill

---------

Co-authored-by: Joyce Fee <102751339+Feediver1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Cahill <45230295+JakeSCahill@users.noreply.github.com>
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 13:48
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Deploy Preview for rp-cloud ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2683f4e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/rp-cloud/deploys/69cbf44a21b36931f8a2d0bd
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-540--rp-cloud.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b34365f8-f9cc-4a00-845e-d7b39a5b9c05

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates to the leader pinning page and cloud release notes. The leader pinning documentation page title changed from "Leader Pinning" to "Configure Leader Pinning" with updated capitalization in the description. Three learning objectives were added to outline rack-label placement, ordered rack preferences for failover, and scenarios where leader pinning cannot place leaders in preferred racks. A new "April 2026" section was added to the cloud release notes announcing support for ordered rack preference in leader pinning configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • micheleRP
  • david-yu
  • mattschumpert
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is a template with unfilled placeholders (issue number, review deadline, page previews, and unchecked boxes), providing no actual details about the changes. Complete the description by filling in the issue number, adding page preview links, selecting appropriate change type checkboxes, and providing details about the ordered rack preference feature.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Release 26.1 docs for Cloud" is partially related to the changeset but overly broad and not specific about the main change. Revise the title to be more specific about the primary change, such as "Add leader pinning ordered rack preference documentation" or "Document leader pinning configuration improvements."
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch 26.1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@modules/get-started/pages/whats-new-cloud.adoc`:
- Line 13: The sentence describing Leader pinning's ordered_racks is too
absolute; update the wording around the `ordered_racks` behavior (and related
mention of `racks`/Leader pinning) to avoid "only" failover language—replace the
clause “fails over to subsequent racks only when higher-priority racks become
unavailable” with a softer phrasing such as “typically fails over to subsequent
racks when higher-priority racks are unavailable or cannot be selected” (or
similar) to reflect caveats on the detailed page.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f9a672e8-8dd2-48a8-a244-477274c1406e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d6250b and d3995f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • modules/develop/pages/produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc
  • modules/get-started/pages/whats-new-cloud.adoc


=== Ordered rack preference for leader pinning

xref:develop:produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc[Leader pinning] now supports the `ordered_racks` configuration value, which lets you specify preferred racks in priority order. Unlike `racks`, which distributes leaders uniformly across all listed racks, `ordered_racks` places leaders in the highest-priority available rack and fails over to subsequent racks only when higher-priority racks become unavailable.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Avoid absolute failover wording that may overstate behavior.

The phrase “fails over … only when higher-priority racks become unavailable” is likely too absolute. Consider softer wording (for example, “typically” / “when higher-priority racks are unavailable or cannot be selected”) to stay consistent with the detailed page’s caveats.

Suggested wording tweak
-xref:develop:produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc[Leader pinning] now supports the `ordered_racks` configuration value, which lets you specify preferred racks in priority order. Unlike `racks`, which distributes leaders uniformly across all listed racks, `ordered_racks` places leaders in the highest-priority available rack and fails over to subsequent racks only when higher-priority racks become unavailable.
+xref:develop:produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc[Leader pinning] now supports the `ordered_racks` configuration value, which lets you specify preferred racks in priority order. Unlike `racks`, which distributes leaders uniformly across all listed racks, `ordered_racks` places leaders in the highest-priority available rack and can fail over to subsequent racks when higher-priority racks are unavailable or cannot be selected.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
xref:develop:produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc[Leader pinning] now supports the `ordered_racks` configuration value, which lets you specify preferred racks in priority order. Unlike `racks`, which distributes leaders uniformly across all listed racks, `ordered_racks` places leaders in the highest-priority available rack and fails over to subsequent racks only when higher-priority racks become unavailable.
xref:develop:produce-data/leader-pinning.adoc[Leader pinning] now supports the `ordered_racks` configuration value, which lets you specify preferred racks in priority order. Unlike `racks`, which distributes leaders uniformly across all listed racks, `ordered_racks` places leaders in the highest-priority available rack and can fail over to subsequent racks when higher-priority racks are unavailable or cannot be selected.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@modules/get-started/pages/whats-new-cloud.adoc` at line 13, The sentence
describing Leader pinning's ordered_racks is too absolute; update the wording
around the `ordered_racks` behavior (and related mention of `racks`/Leader
pinning) to avoid "only" failover language—replace the clause “fails over to
subsequent racks only when higher-priority racks become unavailable” with a
softer phrasing such as “typically fails over to subsequent racks when
higher-priority racks are unavailable or cannot be selected” (or similar) to
reflect caveats on the detailed page.

micheleRP and others added 6 commits March 31, 2026 14:53
…536)

* DOC-1809 Document Cloud Feature Group-based Access Control via OIDC

* note GBAC not supported in Serverless

* trigger Netlify rebuild

* Apply suggestion from @JakeSCahill

---------

Co-authored-by: Jake Cahill <45230295+JakeSCahill@users.noreply.github.com>
* DOC-1811 Document Cloud Feature User-based throughput quotas

* fix: restore docs repo branch to main in local playbook

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Cahill <45230295+JakeSCahill@users.noreply.github.com>
* DOC-1825 Document Cloud Feature Cloud Topics

* move files & add aliases, consistent with docs repo

* Add Next steps section to create-topic.adoc and rename nav entry to Overview

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Update modules/develop/pages/topics/index.adoc

Co-authored-by: Joyce Fee <102751339+Feediver1@users.noreply.github.com>

* incorporate doc review feedback

* chore: trigger Netlify rebuild for PR 526

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: restore docs repo branch to main in local playbook

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Joyce Fee <102751339+Feediver1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joyce Fee <joyce@redpanda.com>
* DOC-1599 Document feature cross-region RRR on AWS

* coderabbit feedback
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill merged commit 826ce59 into main Mar 31, 2026
5 checks passed
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill deleted the 26.1 branch March 31, 2026 16:24
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2026
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants