Skip to content

DOC-2045: Add missing limits to Serverless usage limits#518

Merged
micheleRP merged 3 commits intomainfrom
DOC-2045-Add-missing-limits-to-Serverless-Limits-page
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

DOC-2045: Add missing limits to Serverless usage limits#518
micheleRP merged 3 commits intomainfrom
DOC-2045-Add-missing-limits-to-Serverless-Limits-page

Conversation

@micheleRP
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@micheleRP micheleRP commented Mar 10, 2026

Description

Add Producer IDs, Schema Registry (max schemas, max subjects, rate limit), Connect pipelines, MCP servers, and AI agents limits to the Serverless cluster type page.

Resolves https://redpandadata.atlassian.net/browse/DOC-2045
Review deadline:

Page previews

Serverless usage limits

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

Add Producer IDs, Schema Registry (max schemas, max subjects, rate
limit), Connect pipelines, MCP servers, and AI agents limits to the
Serverless cluster type page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@micheleRP micheleRP requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2026 20:16
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Deploy Preview for rp-cloud ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 68dd585
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/rp-cloud/deploys/69b1c61c2f0cd70008732aa5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-518--rp-cloud.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e62f917b-7428-45ab-b876-4ca9a39f3104

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the Serverless documentation page by expanding the usage limits section. It adds new limits for Producer IDs (250), Schema Registry (with max schemas, subjects, and rate limits), Connect pipelines (10), MCP servers (10), and AI agents (10). Additionally, a formatting inconsistency on the Connections limit entry is corrected.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Feediver1
  • nicolaferraro
  • towfiqa
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding missing usage limits to the Serverless cluster type documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description follows the required template with all essential sections completed: description, page previews, and checks marked appropriately.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch DOC-2045-Add-missing-limits-to-Serverless-Limits-page

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@modules/get-started/pages/cluster-types/serverless.adoc`:
- Line 33: The page currently contradicts itself by listing "Connect pipelines"
as allowed for Serverless while elsewhere stating "Kafka Connect" is
unsupported; update the Serverless doc to resolve this by either (a) editing the
unsupported-features section to explicitly allow "Connect pipelines" or (b)
clarifying terminology—make a clear distinction between "Connect pipelines"
(supported) and "Kafka Connect" (unsupported) wherever both terms appear
(notably the line that says "Kafka Connect" is unsupported and the bullet that
lists "Connect pipelines"); ensure the wording consistently states which feature
is supported and, if both coexist, add a short parenthetical definition so
readers know they are different.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 556bd1cc-3e81-4937-87ce-c9e4013720fa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc03873 and f41b8fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/get-started/pages/cluster-types/serverless.adoc

@micheleRP micheleRP requested a review from towfiqa March 10, 2026 20:23
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@towfiqa towfiqa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks awesome!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Feediver1 Feediver1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@micheleRP micheleRP merged commit 95e6e0b into main Mar 11, 2026
5 checks passed
@micheleRP micheleRP deleted the DOC-2045-Add-missing-limits-to-Serverless-Limits-page branch March 11, 2026 20:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2026
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants