Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Mar 25, 2020

(cherry picked from commit 472fc84)

Co-authored-by: Stefan Krah [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue39689

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 2 of 4 required status checks are expected..

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format ? with standard size (GH-18969) Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format ? with standard size (GH-18969) [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 572ef74 into python:3.8 Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Pull Request is not mergeable.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-472fc84-3.8 branch March 31, 2020 12:26
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants