Small buffer pass optimization as discussed in #395. #402
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martinnj
force-pushed
the
patch/readline-optimization
branch
from
2f6756e to
9d9c1e9
Compare
jparise
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2022
Collaborator
|
Thank you! |
martinnj
added a commit
to martinnj/pymemcache
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2022
…est#402) Basically ensure the client only does one pass over the buffer instead of two. Exact thread: pinterest#395 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Basically ensure the client only does one pass over the buffer instead of two.
Exact thread: #395 (comment)