Conversation
initial refactoring of `pg-promise` code.
|
The issue on Travis CI is unrelated to the change. |
|
If you rebase on master this should be good! |
flovilmart
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What’s the relationale behind the dash-cased tx names vs camelCase? Just conventions?
|
@flovilmart yes, just conventions. Also, in line with the use of pg-monitor, which I believe you guys are not using, though it is very useful, to be able to see exactly what is going on. 😉 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4401 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.66% 92.64% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 118 118
Lines 8348 8346 -2
==========================================
- Hits 7736 7732 -4
- Misses 612 614 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@flovilmart I should have just used ES6 |
|
Let’s try not to have Babel regenerator runtime as we’ve had performance problems with it in the past, that’s why I aim to maintain the minimum amount of transpilation and move forward with LTS. Now we’re targeting 6.11. And we could /should probably target current LTS. What do you think? |
|
@flovilmart That's absolutely not what I suggested. ES6 generators are supported since Node 4 😉 Also, I never use Babel for anything, not a fan of its over-the-head project configurations 😄 |
|
Perfect then! Wasn’t sure since when they were available .) |
initial refactoring of `pg-promise` code.
initial refactoring of `pg-promise` code.
initial refactoring of
pg-promisecode.