Skip to content

fix: 修复组件分离时,组件信息的不完整,根据组件的npm包,补全组件npm 字段#1153

Closed
1degrees wants to merge 1 commit intoopentiny:developfrom
1degrees:fix/splitMaterials
Closed

fix: 修复组件分离时,组件信息的不完整,根据组件的npm包,补全组件npm 字段#1153
1degrees wants to merge 1 commit intoopentiny:developfrom
1degrees:fix/splitMaterials

Conversation

@1degrees
Copy link
Contributor

@1degrees 1degrees commented Feb 27, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced how component details are populated by automatically incorporating available package metadata. This improvement ensures that missing information—such as version, destructuring, script, and style data—is reliably added when applicable for a more complete display.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The change primarily enhances the splitMaterials function in scripts/splitMaterials.mjs by extracting an additional packages property from the bundle.data.materials object. This allows the function to check a component's npm field against the packages array and conditionally populate missing details (version, destructuring, script, and css). The update also adjusts the exported variables to include packages for broader data access.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs - Updated destructuring to include packages from bundle.data.materials.
- Added logic to check the npm field and populate missing package details if found.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant SM as splitMaterials
    participant M as bundle.data.materials
    participant P as Packages
    SM->>M: Extract components, snippets, blocks, packages
    loop For each component
        SM->>P: Check if npm field matches any package
        alt Package found and fields undefined
            P-->>SM: Return package details (version, destructuring, script, css)
            SM->>SM: Update component's npm fields
        else No package or fields already defined
            SM->>SM: Continue processing
        end
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug, refactor-main

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi
  • chilingling

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a hop so light,
Coding changes that make it all right.
Packages and components blend in the stream,
Filling the gaps like a digital dream.
Hares cheer as our logic takes flight! 🐰✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs (1)

41-46: Consider a more robust implementation for complementing npm fields.

The current implementation provides a good solution for enhancing component data, but could be improved for better readability and robustness.

// 补全组件的npm 字段
const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
-if (pack) {
+if (pack && comp.npm) {
  const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css'];
-  complete.forEach(e => !comp.npm?.[e] && (comp.npm[e] = pack[e]))
+  complete.forEach(field => {
+    if (pack[field] && !comp.npm[field]) {
+      comp.npm[field] = pack[field];
+    }
+  });
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36a2b5e and b2a66fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/splitMaterials.mjs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/splitMaterials.mjs (1)

12-12: LGTM: Added packages to the destructured properties.

The change appropriately extracts the packages property from bundle.data.materials to access package-related information for component enhancement.

Comment on lines +41 to +46
// 补全组件的npm 字段
const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
if (pack) {
const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css'];
complete.forEach(e => !comp.npm?.[e] && (comp.npm[e] = pack[e]))
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential runtime error when comp.npm is undefined.

While the code correctly uses optional chaining in line 42 (comp.npm?.package), line 45 attempts to assign values to comp.npm[e] without first verifying that comp.npm exists. This could cause a runtime error if a component doesn't have an npm property.

// 补全组件的npm 字段
const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
-if (pack) {
+if (pack && comp.npm) {
  const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css'];
  complete.forEach(e => !comp.npm?.[e] && (comp.npm[e] = pack[e]))
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// 补全组件的npm 字段
const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
if (pack) {
const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css'];
complete.forEach(e => !comp.npm?.[e] && (comp.npm[e] = pack[e]))
}
// 补全组件的npm 字段
const pack = packages.find((child) => child.package === comp.npm?.package);
if (pack && comp.npm) {
const complete = ['version', 'destructuring', 'script', 'css'];
complete.forEach(e => !comp.npm?.[e] && (comp.npm[e] = pack[e]))
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant