Skip to content

USHIFT-6380: Fix OLM test flakes#5933

Closed
pacevedom wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
pacevedom:USHIFT-6380
Closed

USHIFT-6380: Fix OLM test flakes#5933
pacevedom wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
pacevedom:USHIFT-6380

Conversation

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 17, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 17, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 17, 2025

@pacevedom: This pull request references USHIFT-6380 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target either version "4.22." or "openshift-4.22.", but it targets "openshift-4.21" instead.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pacevedom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 17, 2025
@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 17, 2025
@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just found a different issue, will push a different fix.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

@pacevedom: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ai-model-serving
/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance
/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm
/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
/test test-rpm
/test test-unit
/test verify
/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test images
/test security
/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-release
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-release-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-release

echo "ERROR: Could not successfully verify mirrored image '${dst_img}'" >&2
return 1
fi
rm -rf "${tmp_dir}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did we measure how much longer it takes to run mirroring with this verification?
Especially with the images already present on the disk, the second pass performance might be hit significantly.

IMO, I'm not sure we need this type of verification because we never found an evidence that skopeo does not report download errors.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was a leftover from previous investigation, which is wrong. Now it should be ok, going to run all tests couple of times to see if the flake manifests itself.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-release

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Dec 17, 2025

e2e-aws-tests-periodics: greenboot timeout while waiting for cert-manager to start

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-release

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

@pacevedom: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic 31a534c link true /test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic 31a534c link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-release 31a534c link true /test e2e-aws-tests-release
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release 31a534c link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #5942, which also adds more scenarios
/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Dec 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 18, 2025

@ggiguash: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Closing in favor of #5942, which also adds more scenarios
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants