NO-ISSUE: fix lvms and tlsv13 RF tests by agullon · Pull Request #5637 · openshift/microshift

agullon · 2025-10-20T07:49:54Z

fix SCENARIOS_SOURCES var from test/bin/ci_phase_boot_and_test.sh script
- previously SCENARIO_TYPE var was always empty, with this change ginkgo binary is build before the scenarios start
split the code into 2 functions to be able to use them from lvms scenarios:
- setup_oc_and_kubeconfig() and wait_for_microshift_to_be_ready()
fix start images for lvms and tlsv13 tests
add setup_oc_and_kubeconfig() in all lvms scenarios because kubeconfig file must be set before running lvms-helpersscripts

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-20T07:49:58Z

@agullon: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

agullon · 2025-10-20T08:25:36Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T09:00:07Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T09:17:53Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T09:51:51Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T11:03:17Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T12:24:24Z

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm

agullon · 2025-10-20T12:33:29Z

/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm

agullon · 2025-10-20T13:00:28Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T13:40:41Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T17:19:24Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-20T17:41:45Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-21T07:34:14Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-10-21T15:41:51Z

/retest

test/bin/scenario.sh

agullon · 2025-11-05T10:43:56Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-11-05T13:03:35Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-11-05T14:50:04Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-11-05T16:17:08Z

/verified by CI

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-11-05T16:17:21Z

@agullon: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

agullon · 2025-11-05T16:22:25Z

/retest all

openshift-ci · 2025-11-05T16:22:35Z

@agullon: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ai-model-serving

/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance

/test e2e-aws-tests

/test e2e-aws-tests-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic

/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

/test e2e-aws-tests-release

/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm

/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus

/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus

/test test-rpm

/test test-unit

/test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test images

/test security

/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-release

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-release-arm

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify

Details

In response to this:

/retest all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

agullon · 2025-11-05T16:23:24Z

/test all

… into fix_tlsv13_ostree_ref

agullon · 2025-11-05T17:03:17Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-11-06T07:20:43Z

/retest

pacevedom · 2025-11-06T07:44:44Z

/hold cancel

agullon · 2025-11-06T08:35:54Z

/retest

agullon · 2025-11-06T09:18:28Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2025-11-06T10:36:12Z

@agullon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

agullon · 2025-11-06T11:09:51Z

/verified by CI

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-11-06T11:10:02Z

@agullon: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

pacevedom

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2025-11-06T11:15:02Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, pacevedom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [agullon,pacevedom]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2025-11-06T11:19:09Z

@agullon: #5637 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.20":

Applying: fix ostree ref on tlsv13 scenarios
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in test/scenarios/releases/el96-lrel@tlsv13-standard2.sh
Auto-merging test/scenarios/releases/el96-lrel@tlsv13-standard2.sh
CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in test/scenarios/releases/el96-lrel@tlsv13-standard1.sh
Auto-merging test/scenarios/releases/el96-lrel@tlsv13-standard1.sh
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 fix ostree ref on tlsv13 scenarios

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

fix ostree ref on tlsv13 scenarios

c10c7d9

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 20, 2025

openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 20, 2025

openshift-ci bot requested review from eslutsky and vanhalenar October 20, 2025 07:50

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 20, 2025

Merge branch 'main' into fix_tlsv13_ostree_ref

c22ca12

openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 20, 2025

fix ostree ref for lvms scenario

131405d

agullon changed the title ~~NO-ISSUE: fix ostree ref on tlsv13 scenarios~~ NO-ISSUE: fix ostree ref on tlsv13 and lvms scenarios Oct 20, 2025

agullon added 2 commits October 22, 2025 11:23

add new function to setup oc and kubeconfig to be use in lvms tests

e0f2353

add wait for microshift to be ready

fbadd0b

kasturinarra reviewed Oct 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

test/bin/scenario.sh Show resolved Hide resolved

agullon added 3 commits October 22, 2025 15:12

set test_results_dir var

cf5c041

adding more logs

4f69102

increase disk size for lvms scenarios

a413c90

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 5, 2025

agullon added 2 commits November 5, 2025 17:29

fix ginkgo typo

e3fc204

Merge branch 'fix_tlsv13_ostree_ref' of github.com:agullon/microshift…

f67129e

… into fix_tlsv13_ostree_ref

openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 5, 2025

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 6, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 6, 2025

pacevedom approved these changes Nov 6, 2025

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2025

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 798bca3 into openshift:main Nov 6, 2025
17 checks passed

agullon added a commit to agullon/microshift that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2025

manual backport changes from openshift#5637

e8c5b4e

agullon mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2025

[release-4.20] NO-ISSUE: fix lvms and tlsv13 RF tests #5703

Merged

Conversation

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 21, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 21, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 5, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

pacevedom commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

agullon commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

pacevedom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

agullon commented Oct 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading