Skip to content

USHIFT-1313 Test: Rebooting unhealthy system results in restoring data from a backup#1891

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pmtk:1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore
Jun 23, 2023
Merged

USHIFT-1313 Test: Rebooting unhealthy system results in restoring data from a backup#1891
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pmtk:1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore

Conversation

@pmtk
Copy link
Member

@pmtk pmtk commented Jun 6, 2023

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 6, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 6, 2023

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 6, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 6, 2023

Depends (and current includes) on #1866

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from pacevedom and pliurh June 6, 2023 17:02
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 6, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 6, 2023

/cc @jogeo @dhensel-rh @dhellmann

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dhellmann, dhensel-rh and jogeo June 6, 2023 17:02
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch from 138ac8e to 9b0c6d5 Compare June 7, 2023 07:48
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch from a3281b1 to 235cc59 Compare June 20, 2023 10:52
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 20, 2023
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch 2 times, most recently from 8fc3da6 to 48b2bff Compare June 20, 2023 11:04
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 20, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 20, 2023

/test ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@pmtk: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
  • /test images
  • /test microshift-e2e
  • /test test-srpm
  • /test test-unit
  • /test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
  • /test microshift-e2e-arm
  • /test microshift-metal-tests
  • /test microshift-metal-tests-arm
  • /test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-microshift-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-microshift-e2e-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 20, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests

@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 20, 2023

/remove-label tide/merge-method-squash

@pmtk pmtk changed the title WIP USHIFT-1313 Test: Rebooting unhealthy system results in restoring data from a backup USHIFT-1313 Test: Rebooting unhealthy system results in restoring data from a backup Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. labels Jun 20, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 20, 2023

/retest

@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch 2 times, most recently from 4936e16 to 0951943 Compare June 20, 2023 16:32
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 20, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests

@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch from 0951943 to ce6ab8f Compare June 21, 2023 08:05
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 21, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests

@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch from ce6ab8f to f70e5ba Compare June 21, 2023 12:05
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 21, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests images

Copy link
Contributor

@dhellmann dhellmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/test images
/lgtm

This looks good. I had a couple of nitpicky suggestions, but I'll leave it up to you to decide if you want to make the changes.

/hold
@jogeo do you want to assign QE reviewer before we merge it?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 21, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 21, 2023
@pmtk pmtk force-pushed the 1313-unhealthy-reboot-restore branch from f70e5ba to 8dd724c Compare June 22, 2023 09:12
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2023
@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 22, 2023

/test microshift-metal-tests

@dhensel-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhellmann, dhensel-rh, pmtk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Jun 23, 2023

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 23, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2023

@pmtk: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm 8dd724c link false /test microshift-e2e-arm

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants