Skip to content

USHIFT-1122: set minimum container-selinux dependency to 2.208#1712

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
dhellmann:USHIFT-1122-container-selinux-dependency-2.208
Apr 27, 2023
Merged

USHIFT-1122: set minimum container-selinux dependency to 2.208#1712
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
dhellmann:USHIFT-1122-container-selinux-dependency-2.208

Conversation

@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 25, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 25, 2023

@dhellmann: This pull request references USHIFT-1122 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ggiguash and pmtk April 25, 2023 18:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 25, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

microshift-e2e is failing with service-ca-controller in CrashLoopBackOff, so I think this version of container-selinux does not work on the 9.1 images.

container-selinux.noarch                      3:2.208.0-2.rhaos4.13.el9                                        @rhocp-4.13-for-rhel-9-mirrorbeta-x86_64-rpms
openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy.noarch       1.0-31.el9fdp                                                    @rhocp-4.13-for-rhel-9-mirrorbeta-x86_64-rpms
selinux-policy.noarch                         34.1.43-1.el9                                                    @anaconda                                    
selinux-policy-targeted.noarch                34.1.43-1.el9                                                    @anaconda                                    

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

/test microshift-e2e-arm
/test microshift-e2e

1 similar comment
@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

/test microshift-e2e-arm
/test microshift-e2e

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Apr 27, 2023

  • Conformance-reduced[-arm]: These failures are expected since it's still being run on a rhel 9.1 VM on GCP. A PR is on hold to update these tests, pending this one being merged.

  • e2e-arm: This is most likely from a bug in the CI scripts, but it's impossible to tell exactly what from the sparse logs. We'll need to merge this PR so that we can debug the CI scripts.

/pj-rehearse ack
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 27, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: copejon, dhellmann

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Apr 27, 2023

/skip e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
/skip e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
/skip microshift-e2e-arm

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Apr 27, 2023

/override e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
/override e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
/override microshift-e2e-arm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 27, 2023

@copejon: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
  • e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
  • microshift-e2e-arm

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
  • ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/microshift-e2e
  • ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm
  • ci/prow/test-srpm
  • ci/prow/test-unit
  • ci/prow/verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-microshift-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-microshift-e2e-arm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-srpm
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
/override e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
/override microshift-e2e-arm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@copejon
Copy link
Contributor

copejon commented Apr 27, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
/override ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 27, 2023

@copejon: Overrode contexts on behalf of copejon: ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced, ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm, ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced-arm
/override ci/prow/e2e-openshift-conformance-reduced
/override ci/prow/microshift-e2e-arm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b976724 and 2 for PR HEAD e4adb70 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 27, 2023

@dhellmann: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cf03a6b into openshift:main Apr 27, 2023
@dhellmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.13

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dhellmann: new pull request created: #1731

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants