Skip to content

[WIP] just for Pr 349 buid#356

Draft
zhaozhanqi wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
zhaozhanqi:pr-349-merged
Draft

[WIP] just for Pr 349 buid#356
zhaozhanqi wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
zhaozhanqi:pr-349-merged

Conversation

@zhaozhanqi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 24, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhaozhanqi
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelspeed for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zhaozhanqi zhaozhanqi marked this pull request as draft December 24, 2025 01:16
@zhaozhanqi zhaozhanqi force-pushed the pr-349-merged branch 2 times, most recently from 03b4f19 to c22e963 Compare December 24, 2025 01:44
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 6, 2026
Riccardo Ravaioli and others added 2 commits March 10, 2026 16:35
Vendor openshift/api changes that add no-overlay mode support to the
Network operator API. This regenerates the apply configurations to
include:
- Transport field
- NoOverlayConfig field
- BGPManagedConfig field
- NoOverlayConfig struct
- BGPManagedConfig struct

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ravaioli <rravaiol@redhat.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants