Conversation
f5ab743 to
fc61b22
Compare
come-nc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I do not understand the PR, it checks the same files twice, once as paths, once as nodes?
Why is that needed? Why was it not working before?
975782e to
17b40e1
Compare
Good question, but I don't know. For some reason we're still able to download non-downloadable files using workarounds that I explained in the PR description. I've double-tested it on Regarding duplicated checks - I've added one more commit that simplifies this. So, now we recursively collecting files to download only once and perform check only once. Also in previous implementation non-downloaded files break whole download (check not works, but idea was the same). Now we're just skipping such files and not break download process. |
13673e9 to
26992d1
Compare
34a4eda to
ed1a86a
Compare
|
@susnux @AndyScherzinger guys, can you take a look on it, please? |
Signed-off-by: Kostiantyn Miakshyn <molodchick@gmail.com>
ed1a86a to
d86267b
Compare
TODO
Checklist
3. to review, feature component)stable32)