Correct spelling of Brute Force and other fixes#41642
Correct spelling of Brute Force and other fixes#41642AndyScherzinger merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Correcting the spelling of "Bruteforce" to "Brute Force" Signed-off-by: Valdnet <47037905+Valdnet@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Valdnet <47037905+Valdnet@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Valdnet <47037905+Valdnet@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Valdnet <47037905+Valdnet@users.noreply.github.com>
come-nc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not an english native speaker so I do not know about the change itself but the PR won’t break anything 👍
rakekniven
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"brute-force" is correct from my pov. Can you double check?
|
"brute-force" is an alternative spelling of this word. |
I just did a search at Transifex
Just did a search at Tx for the NC project: Bruteforce: 6 results. You modified 3 of them here. 👍 For me, "brute force" or "brute-force" is fine. As long as we establish one (!) spelling and adapt all occurrences. |
|
I propose "Brute force" 😁. |
:-) Have you seen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute-force_search and the spelling there? |
|
So we change it to "Brute-force" 😉. |
Signed-off-by: Valdnet <47037905+Valdnet@users.noreply.github.com>
Hahaha. Did not expect this change and had to adapt my other two PRs as well. Now it should be good. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.