Fix task processing registration validation#548
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lukas Schaefer <lukas@lschaefer.xyz>
|
We should probably continue to support the old version as well |
…ssistant Signed-off-by: Lukas Schaefer <lukas@lschaefer.xyz>
|
Adjusted the changes to validate it how nc_py sent it, and modified the transformation to have it be correct for the assistant to use it. |
That shouldn't be necessary anymore if we are just keeping the old behavior for cloud-py-api/nc_py_api#346 and just ensuring that passes validation. |
kyteinsky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
perfect, thanks a lot!
that was before the discussion with him I believe. |
|
I can tomorrow check this PR with our AI apps. @kyteinsky @marcelklehr should we backport it or not? |
should be good to imo |
|
Thanks @lukasdotcom ! |
|
/backport to stable31 |
|
/backport to stable30 |
AppApi adjustment for cloud-py-api/nc_py_api#346