Conversation
d78ae7d to
65fd39f
Compare
icewind1991
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not a fan of having additional explicit cross-app dependencies.
We can maybe add an storage extention interface to core that has a filterUserAccess or something similar to decouple things, but that can be done later.
Overall the approach of the filtering is fine and shouldn't be to bad for performance, once the listed issues are addressed this is good from my pov
e7c53f9 to
e87988f
Compare
|
not a fan of cross-app either. once merged and backported we can look into make it cleaner if low effort |
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
e87988f to
946aecb
Compare
|
|
/backport to stable25 |
This is a real problem and it's one example for why NC code probably gets harder and harder to maintain. You are adding technical debt and "can be done later" and "make it cleaner if low effort" effectively means that it will never be done unless there's really someone who tracks these issues. |
Beware, spooky review required 🎃
when running with
activity_use_cached_mountpointson a file: