Fix overloadTag2 test

[jakebailey]

Fixup for after #52474.

[jakebailey]

Unless the intent was to show this error; in which case I will revert the change to the test and just accept the baseline:

diff --git a/./tests/baselines/reference/overloadTag2.errors.txt b/./tests/baselines/local/overloadTag2.errors.txt
index d6faad296c..e3b54ad441 100644
--- a/./tests/baselines/reference/overloadTag2.errors.txt
+++ b/./tests/baselines/local/overloadTag2.errors.txt
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
+tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js(14,9): error TS2394: This overload signature is not compatible with its implementation signature.
 tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js(25,20): error TS7006: Parameter 'b' implicitly has an 'any' type.
 tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js(30,9): error TS2554: Expected 1-2 arguments, but got 0.
 
 
-==== tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js (2 errors) ====
+==== tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js (3 errors) ====
     export class Foo {
         #a = true ? 1 : "1"
         #b
@@ -17,6 +18,9 @@ tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js(30,9): error TS2554: Expected 1-2
         /**
          * @constructor
          * @overload
+            ~~~~~~~~
+!!! error TS2394: This overload signature is not compatible with its implementation signature.
+!!! related TS2750 tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc/overloadTag2.js:25:5: The implementation signature is declared here.
          * @param {number} a
          */
         /**

[sandersn]

The intent was to show the error, since there was some discussion about whether it was a good idea, and we decided on Yes.

[jakebailey]

Alright, redoing!