LCORE-1434: fixed linter issue

[tisnik]

Description

LCORE-1434: fixed linter issue

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement
• Benchmarks improvement

Tools used to create PR

• Assisted-by: N/A
• Generated by: N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue #LCORE-1434

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Enhanced code quality validation by enabling additional lint rules to catch potential issues during development.

• Tests

  • Simplified test utility code implementation for improved clarity and maintainability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Two minor updates: B010 lint rule added to Ruff configuration, and a setattr call replaced with direct attribute assignment in a test utility class.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Linting Configuration pyproject.toml	Added B010 to the Ruff lint extend-select list in [tool.ruff.lint].
Test Refactoring tests/unit/utils/test_responses.py	Replaced setattr(self, "type", item_type) with direct assignment self.type = item_type in MockOutputItem.init.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is vague and generic. While it mentions 'fixed linter issue', it doesn't specify which linter issue or rule (B010) was addressed, making it unclear what the actual change is about.	Consider using a more specific title like 'Enable B010 linter rule and fix related issues' to clearly communicate the specific linter rule being addressed.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/unit/utils/test_responses.py (1)

63-64: Stale comment should be removed.

Line 63 mentions setattr which is no longer used. The comment is now misleading since the code uses direct attribute assignment.

🧹 Proposed fix to remove stale comment

-        # Use setattr to avoid conflict with built-in 'type'
         self.type = item_type

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tests/unit/utils/test_responses.py` around lines 63 - 64, Remove the stale
comment above the assignment to self.type in the test class; the comment
referencing setattr is outdated because the code now uses direct assignment
(self.type = item_type), so delete or update that comment to avoid confusion and
ensure any remaining comments accurately describe the current code in the
test_responses.py test class around the self.type attribute.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@tests/unit/utils/test_responses.py`:
- Around line 63-64: Remove the stale comment above the assignment to self.type
in the test class; the comment referencing setattr is outdated because the code
now uses direct assignment (self.type = item_type), so delete or update that
comment to avoid confusion and ensure any remaining comments accurately describe
the current code in the test_responses.py test class around the self.type
attribute.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 05c75649-3b5b-4f8f-90c2-bb71d5a18627

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d413f61 and 98e0fa0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• pyproject.toml
• tests/unit/utils/test_responses.py