Re: https://queue.staging.rfc-editor.org/
It seems a decision is needed re: handling of redundant content in the columns of "Labels" and "Assignments" (to be renamed "Status" per #13). Specifically:
- redundant “Stream Hold” in both columns
- redundant “Author Input Required” in both columns
I suggest removing it from "Labels" and leaving it in the "Status" column bc it's providing more information about the "blocked" label that appears there.
Side note: it's missing a space when there are two items in "Status", e.g., for draft-ietf-teep-protocol
- Current:
Reference Not Received (2nd Generation)Author Input Required
- Perhaps:
Reference Not Received (2nd Generation), Author Input Required perhaps with a comma or other separator because they are not appearing with "label" styling.
(fwiw, this example is in AUTH*A in the existing system because there the concept of "Author Input Required" overrides "Reference Not Received".)
Re: https://queue.staging.rfc-editor.org/
It seems a decision is needed re: handling of redundant content in the columns of "Labels" and "Assignments" (to be renamed "Status" per #13). Specifically:
I suggest removing it from "Labels" and leaving it in the "Status" column bc it's providing more information about the "blocked" label that appears there.
Side note: it's missing a space when there are two items in "Status", e.g., for draft-ietf-teep-protocol
Reference Not Received (2nd Generation)Author Input RequiredReference Not Received (2nd Generation), Author Input Requiredperhaps with a comma or other separator because they are not appearing with "label" styling.(fwiw, this example is in AUTH*A in the existing system because there the concept of "Author Input Required" overrides "Reference Not Received".)