[compiler] Don't show hint about ref-like naming if we infer another type#34521
Merged
josephsavona merged 1 commit intomainfrom Sep 18, 2025
Merged
[compiler] Don't show hint about ref-like naming if we infer another type#34521josephsavona merged 1 commit intomainfrom
josephsavona merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
mvitousek
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2025
…type Some components accept a union of a ref callback function or ref object. In this case we may infer the type as a function due to the presence of invoking the ref callback function. In that case, we currently report a "Hint: name `fooRef` as "ref" or with a "-Ref" suffix..." even though the variable is already named appropriately — the problem is that we inferred a non-ref type. So here we check the type and don't report this hint if we inferred another type.
6c55e40 to
f8fa3a3
Compare
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
…type (#34521) Some components accept a union of a ref callback function or ref object. In this case we may infer the type as a function due to the presence of invoking the ref callback function. In that case, we currently report a "Hint: name `fooRef` as "ref" or with a "-Ref" suffix..." even though the variable is already named appropriately — the problem is that we inferred a non-ref type. So here we check the type and don't report this hint if we inferred another type. DiffTrain build for [1bcdd22](1bcdd22)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
…type (#34521) Some components accept a union of a ref callback function or ref object. In this case we may infer the type as a function due to the presence of invoking the ref callback function. In that case, we currently report a "Hint: name `fooRef` as "ref" or with a "-Ref" suffix..." even though the variable is already named appropriately — the problem is that we inferred a non-ref type. So here we check the type and don't report this hint if we inferred another type. DiffTrain build for [1bcdd22](1bcdd22)
This was referenced Sep 19, 2025
unstubbable
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2025
[diff facebook/react@84af9085...d415fd3e](facebook/react@84af908...d415fd3) <details> <summary>React upstream changes</summary> - facebook/react#34536 - facebook/react#34534 - facebook/react#34531 - facebook/react#34499 - facebook/react#34523 - facebook/react#34511 - facebook/react#34516 - facebook/react#34455 - facebook/react#34488 - facebook/react#34521 </details>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some components accept a union of a ref callback function or ref object. In this case we may infer the type as a function due to the presence of invoking the ref callback function. In that case, we currently report a "Hint: name
fooRefas "ref" or with a "-Ref" suffix..." even though the variable is already named appropriately — the problem is that we inferred a non-ref type. So here we check the type and don't report this hint if we inferred another type.