Add RID for alpine-3.17 + alpine-{armv6,x86,s390x,ppc64le}#75396
Add RID for alpine-3.17 + alpine-{armv6,x86,s390x,ppc64le}#75396jkotas merged 2 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
Conversation
ghost
added
community-contribution
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries Issue DetailsAdds RID for Alpine 3.17 + all arches that both runtime and alpine can target for eventual port. Contributes to dotnet/core#7684
|
ayakael
changed the title
ayakael
force-pushed
the
alpine/arch-rid
branch
2 times, most recently
from
072f6d6 to
dff46ed
Compare
wfurt
left a comment
wfurt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks ok to me. since are are adding new architecture instead of just adding updated release I added few more people for comments.
I was wondering if we should fork the rid but it seems like we retro fit new architectures elsewhere to older releases as well.
| "alpine-armv6": { | ||
| "#import": [ | ||
| "alpine", | ||
| "linux-musl-armv6" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In case it was not obvious, armv6 is only supported with mono runtime. From coreclr, we only build PAL, HP libunwind among few other pieces to support corehost (dotnet(1)) with -p:RuntimeFlavor=mono.
If this is working on Alpine Linux, I think would be nice to add a CI leg for linux-musl-armv6 in extra-platforms pipeline (it may need some extra work in our cross infra setup). If this is untested, I think we should skip armv6 for now.
cc @akoeplinger
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mono is currently broken on musl due to using libc symbols, but I'm in the process of fixing it for s390x and armv6.
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
4 participants
Adds RID for Alpine 3.17 + all arches that both runtime and alpine can target for eventual port.
Contributes to dotnet/core#7684
Contributes to dotnet/source-build#2839
Contributes to dotnet/source-build#3020