Conversation
ghost
added
area-Infrastructure-libraries
community-contribution
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries Issue Detailsinstead of patching dotnet everytime after Signed-off-by: Livy Ge livy.ge@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
@richlander is usually involved in the flow for adding new distros to the graph. Rich? |
|
/cc @agocke |
|
We are currently considering this design proposal. I don't think we can reasonably back-port it to .NET 6, however. Can you share more context? Are you the maintainers for .NET for anolis? |
ericstj
added
the
needs-author-action
|
@geliwei can you please answer @richlander’s question? |
|
I was thinking more about this (based on our continuing conversations on RID simplification). Is the RID for anolis needed for restoring anolis-specific packages or just to ensure that anolis is correctly treated as either |
Hi, |
ghost
removed
the
needs-author-action
|
Hey @geliwei ! If you don't add the RIDs (manually or otherwise), does the .NET build fail? Can you point us to any build logs that show the failure? |
|
This info might be what you are looking for: #50818 We have a maintainers group now. I can add you if you want to join it @geliwei. The new plan for source-build is documented at https://github.com/dotnet/designs/pull/260/files#diff-20aa11d3c5c8d54fc1c45f4b81927255d3951fdd7cf58589fc6d03a2dd2a6a1bR195. |
instead of patching dotnet everytime after it got updated we plan to add runtime ID for anolis 7/anolis 8/anolis 9. Signed-off-by: Livy Ge <livy.ge@gmail.com>
I copy a few errors from http://build.openanolis.cn/kojifiles/work/tasks/7092/297092/build.log: |
|
I have made change to init-distro-rid.sh and also pal.unix.cpp, remove RIDs in runtime.json but keep runtimeGroups.props. But looks like it fails the test again, Would you like to help me figure out why? |
this change works so far on dotnet5.0 https://gitee.com/src-anolis-os/dotnet5.0/commit/39c160eb817b5bab7366ed1d14f8c91d4316ca96 |
|
did we reached conciliation if new bistro is needed @omajid @richlander ? As minimum we should rebuild other json files besides runtimeGroups.props and include this with the PR. |
|
Ideally, we would not and this RID could be added via source-build per #50818. That should be the goto approach for these cases. Is that acceptable? |
Would that mean that RH binaries would be unusable e.g. the RID would work only if distribution has own package created via source-build? |
|
Here's my take/understanding on how the system should work.
By building .NET for a distro as This is the same thing as blood types, where RIDs are like donors and distros are like recipients.
Credit to the Wikipedia page on blood types. This is a fair analogy, right? We can take the analogy a bit further. So far, we're only looking at two columns of donors (or RIDs). Let's look at the |
|
I agree with @richlander, I think this is the correct direction. |
|
@clairernovotny @aortiz-msft It would be good for the NuGet team to review this approach. |
|
cc @tmds who's been doing some recent work to make source build work without code changes to the RID graph. |
|
So if I can summarize the state here, @richlander and @agocke are saying that this PR should not be needed due to the changes to how we expect distro's to source build in .NET 7.0. #66132 (comment) @geliwei do you agree, or are you keeping this PR open for a scenario that wasn't covered by that explanation? Thanks! |
Ping @clairernovotny @aortiz-msft to help with this request.
Ping @richlander @agocke to answer this question.
Ping @geliwei to answer this question. |
#83246 is superseding dotnet/designs#260 and is still being discussed. As other rids are still being added, we can add these too. The graph will be updated as needed for #83246. |
|
I'm closing new RID PRs for now, until we can sort out the RID plan, as in #81115 |
I'm not sure why this doesn't get added, while other rids are still being added. Will we no longer be adding any rids until the RID plan is sorted out? I have good hope we'll sort it out for .NET 8, but I had the same hope for .NET 7. I'd keep business as usual until the plan is decided. |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
12 participants
instead of patching dotnet everytime after
it got updated we plan to add runtime ID for
anolis 7/anolis 8/anolis 9.
Signed-off-by: Livy Ge livy.ge@gmail.com