[release/6.0] Add Fedora 37 RID#65392
Conversation
|
I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label. |
|
Should we make this change in |
|
probably. But I think it would be OK to take it now here and do it in main tomorrow or next week. @carlossanlop noticed some differences how the RID is generated. We are probably ought to check all active branches to make sure the RIDs are the same. AFAIK that was our general goal, right? |
Fedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now identifies itself as Fedora 37 instead of Fedora 36: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html This is a forward-port of dotnet#65392
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @vitek-karas, @agocke, @VSadov Issue DetailsFedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now
|
wfurt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTMN.
But should we start with main/7.0 and roll it back to servicing?
missed #67021 |
Fedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now identifies itself as Fedora 37 instead of Fedora 36: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html This is a forward-port of #65392
Fedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now identifies itself as Fedora 37 instead of Fedora 36: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html This is a forward-port of dotnet#65392
|
dotnet/core#7467 to track support for Fedora 37 |
Fedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now identifies itself as Fedora 37 instead of Fedora 36: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html
|
@wfurt looks like this has a merge conflict. Can we have this merge for the July servicing asap |
Fedora 37 has now started development, and the distribution now
identifies itself as Fedora 37 instead of Fedora 36:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html