Optimize BigInteger formatting#100181
Merged
tannergooding merged 12 commits intodotnet:mainfrom Apr 22, 2024
Merged
Conversation
ghost
added
the
Contributor
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-numerics |
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
tannergooding
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
This was referenced Apr 18, 2024
matouskozak
pushed a commit
to matouskozak/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
* Cleanup DecStr formatting * Cleanup ToNumber portion * Clean and pool base1E9 buffer * Split leaf span and array path * Post cherry-pick update * Remove unworthy positive/negative span/string split * Use stackalloc for buffers * Update constant usage * Use UInt32ToDecChars * Fix type assert * Fix strLength --------- Co-authored-by: Tanner Gooding <tagoo@outlook.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up of #97889