implemented standard list of licenses

[ddey2]

1. When you create a dataset, there should be a new step content for adding a license. A license can be either a standard one or a custom license.
2. If you choose the standard license, you can view the name of the license and click on it to see more details of the license when you're on the dataset page.
3. If you choose the custom license, a modal will open. You can fill in the details and it will be created once you click on 'Finish button'. On the dataset page, you should also see an 'Edit icon button' , on clicking it should open the edit license modal.

PFA screenshots for reference.

[tcnichol]

I'm getting an error when I try to add a custom license. Here is the error I'm seeing

File "pydantic/main.py", line 341, in pydantic.main.BaseModel.__init__ pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for LicenseDB name field required (type=value_error.missing)

[tcnichol]

Tested. Everything works, including custom license which I can edit after adding.

[ddey2]

@tcnichol I added the logo, Could you please retest it?
Now, everywhere I have replaced the standard license names with a logo if available.

[longshuicy]

A few additional things I noticed:

• For holders, are we freely allowing anyone (username? full name? email?) to be the holder or they need to be clowder user? @lmarini

- After creating a custom licnece, then I went in edit for the first time (without changing the date time), i got above error. - if i change anything on the datetime, it passed and it never happened again

[ddey2]

A few additional things I noticed:

• For holders, are we freely allowing anyone (username? full name? email?) to be the holder or they need to be clowder user? @lmarini

- After creating a custom licnece, then I went in edit for the first time (without changing the date time), i got above error. - if i change anything on the datetime, it passed and it never happened again

@longshuicy I am not able to reproduce this one.

[longshuicy]

Works well now. Thank you!

[longshuicy]

Approved.

[longshuicy]

Sorry 2 more things I just noticed. But feel free to address in another issue:

1. The selecting licence part seems to be optional. Is that intended deisgn? @lmarini

2. if nothing is set, could we have some default text saying "no licence?". Right now it's showing a broken link

[lmarini]

Sorry 2 more things I just noticed. But feel free to address in another issue:

1. The selecting licence part seems to be optional. Is that intended deisgn? @lmarini

2. if nothing is set, could we have some default text saying "no licence?". Right now it's showing a broken link

Sorry @longshuicy @ddey2 I clicked merge too quickly! We can definitively do this on a separate PR.

I think we shouldn't let them leave license blank.

[longshuicy]

Sorry 2 more things I just noticed. But feel free to address in another issue:

1. The selecting licence part seems to be optional. Is that intended deisgn? @lmarini

``` 2. if nothing is set, could we have some default text saying "no licence?". Right now it's showing a broken link ```

Sorry @longshuicy @ddey2 I clicked merge too quickly! We can definitively do this on a separate PR.

I think we shouldn't let them leave license blank.

No worries. I meant to open new issue and will do :-)