Skip to content

Conversation

@iamjameswalters
Copy link
Contributor

@iamjameswalters iamjameswalters commented Jul 17, 2024

Description

Adds a locked property to the User class in the SDK.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 17, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 72726de

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 9 packages
Name Type
@clerk/backend Minor
@clerk/astro Patch
@clerk/express Patch
@clerk/fastify Patch
@clerk/nextjs Patch
@clerk/remix Patch
@clerk/clerk-sdk-node Patch
@clerk/tanstack-start Patch
@clerk/testing Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@panteliselef panteliselef changed the title feat: Add locked property to User object in SDK feat(backend): Add locked property to User object in SDK Jul 22, 2024
@panteliselef
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @iamjameswalters thanks for the contribution, could you rebase from latest main ?

@iamjameswalters iamjameswalters force-pushed the feat/add-locked-to-user-obj branch from cf2f068 to a7a6435 Compare July 23, 2024 14:45
@iamjameswalters iamjameswalters force-pushed the feat/add-locked-to-user-obj branch from a7a6435 to 72726de Compare July 23, 2024 14:46
@iamjameswalters
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @iamjameswalters thanks for the contribution, could you rebase from latest main ?

Sure, I've rebased!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants