Skip to content

[branch-52] Bump to 52.3.0 and changelog#20790

Merged
timsaucer merged 3 commits intoapache:branch-52from
hareshkh:changelog-bump-52.3.0
Mar 8, 2026
Merged

[branch-52] Bump to 52.3.0 and changelog#20790
timsaucer merged 3 commits intoapache:branch-52from
hareshkh:changelog-bump-52.3.0

Conversation

@hareshkh
Copy link
Contributor

@hareshkh hareshkh commented Mar 8, 2026

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Bumps to 52.3.0 and changelog

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation development-process Related to development process of DataFusion labels Mar 8, 2026
@timsaucer
Copy link
Member

Thank you for this, but since we had another commit go in #20777 I think we need to regenerate the changelog

@timsaucer timsaucer merged commit 28d012a into apache:branch-52 Mar 8, 2026
32 checks passed
lukekim pushed a commit to spiceai/datafusion that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes #123` indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->

- Related to apache#20681

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

Bumps to 52.3.0 and changelog

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Haresh Khanna <hkhanna@palantir.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Saucer <timsaucer@gmail.com>
alamb pushed a commit to alamb/datafusion that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

- Related to apache#20681

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

## What changes are included in this PR?
Bumps to 52.3.0 and changelog

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

## Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

## Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Haresh Khanna <hkhanna@palantir.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Saucer <timsaucer@gmail.com>
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Mar 10, 2026

BTW I made a PR to forward port this change to main:

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2026
## Which issue does this PR close?

- Part of to #20681
Note I think we should wait to merge this until we officially release
53.3.0

## Rationale for this change

Keep main up to date with the most recent versions

## What changes are included in this PR?
- Bumps to 52.3.0 and changelog
- Forward ports #20790
- `git cherry-pick`  28d012a

## Are these changes tested?
by CI

## Are there any user-facing changes?
New version.

Co-authored-by: Haresh Khanna <kh.haresh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Haresh Khanna <hkhanna@palantir.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Saucer <timsaucer@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oleks V <comphead@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

development-process Related to development process of DataFusion documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants