Merged
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
core
kosiew
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
Contributor
kosiew
left a comment
kosiew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Left a minor suggestion.
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
thanks @kosiew! I'll leave this open until tomorrow so that other people can comment. |
adriangb
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
12 tasks
alamb
pushed a commit
to alamb/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
## Which issue does this PR close? <!-- We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123. --> - Closes apache#20041 ## Rationale for this change <!-- Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in the issue then this section is not needed. Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes. --> Fix a bug that appeared when reading constant values from stats ## What changes are included in this PR? <!-- There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR. --> - A 2-line bug fix - A test that reproduces the issue on `main` and succeeds in this PR ## Are these changes tested? <!-- We typically require tests for all PRs in order to: 1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes 2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are they covered by existing tests)? --> Yes, by a new unit test. Additionally, I tested this changes with https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-distributed and the problem is solved also there. ## Are there any user-facing changes? Nothing besides the bug fix <!-- If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be updated before approving the PR. --> <!-- If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api change` label. -->
alamb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
- Part of #20681 - Closes #20041 on branch-52 This PR: - Backports #20042 from @gabotechs to the `branch-52` line Co-authored-by: Gabriel <45515538+gabotechs@users.noreply.github.com>
26 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
Fix a bug that appeared when reading constant values from stats
What changes are included in this PR?
mainand succeeds in this PRAre these changes tested?
Yes, by a new unit test.
Additionally, I tested this changes with https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-distributed and the problem is solved also there.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Nothing besides the bug fix