Skip to content

Conversation

@ravening
Copy link
Member

Description

Use both tcp protocol and module so that
vpn is enabled properly

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Use both tcp protocol and module so that
vpn is enabled properly
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@ravening can you give this a priority? as we are in code freeze, do we need this before 4.15?

@ravening
Copy link
Member Author

@ravening can you give this a priority? as we are in code freeze, do we need this before 4.15?

@DaanHoogland yes its good to have this before 4.15 as its a bug fix

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland added this to the 4.14.1.0 milestone Oct 27, 2020
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result: ✔centos7 ✖centos8 ✔debian. JID-2295

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Trillian test result (tid-3096)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33180 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr4430-t3096-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermittent failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_kubernetes_clusters.py
Smoke tests completed. 83 look OK, 0 have error(s)
Only failed tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

looks good but i am not sure why protocol would improve on the vpn instead of just restrict it. no regressions so i'm fine with it.

Copy link
Member

@rohityadavcloud rohityadavcloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - though I'm not sure adding the protocol tcp (instead of matcher tcp) makes any difference, I'm not sure what/how it fixes the issue; LGTM as no regression seen in tests

Copy link
Member

@weizhouapache weizhouapache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should be good.

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland merged commit 3414656 into apache:4.14 Nov 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants