-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
kvm: fix exception in volume stats after storage migration #3884
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kvm: fix exception in volume stats after storage migration #3884
Conversation
yadvr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it matter for managed vs unmanaged?
|
@blueorangutan package |
yadvr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nevermind, saw the PR that introduced the regression
|
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-848 |
|
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-849 |
|
Packaging overlap failure, rekicking |
|
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-850 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good, I trust Wei, but as a matter of principle, did someone test?
|
LGTM haven't tested. @weizhouapache if you tested, I'm fine with it - thx for the fix. |
|
@DaanHoogland @andrijapanicsb @rhtyd I have tested with qcow2 on NFS. Did not test local storage and Ceph RBD. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-876 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-1011)
|
|
@skattoju3 can you review this? |
|
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-894 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-1030)
|
) On kvm, the 'path' of volume is the file name on primary storage. we should use 'path' instead of 'uuid' in volume statistics. Fixes: apache#3878
) On kvm, the 'path' of volume is the file name on primary storage. we should use 'path' instead of 'uuid' in volume statistics. Fixes: apache#3878
) On kvm, the 'path' of volume is the file name on primary storage. we should use 'path' instead of 'uuid' in volume statistics. Fixes: apache#3878
) On kvm, the 'path' of volume is the file name on primary storage. we should use 'path' instead of 'uuid' in volume statistics. Fixes: apache#3878
* Applying PR apache#3884 from 4.13: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3884/files * Applying PR apache#3884 from 4.13: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3884/files
Description
on kvm, the 'path' of volume is the file name on primary storage. we should use 'path' instead of 'uuid' in volume statistics.
Fixes: #3878
Types of changes
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?