Skip to content

Update changelog of dockerfile to include Fab missing in Python 3.13#56176

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
potiuk:add-fab-missing-note-in-dockerfile-changelog
Sep 28, 2025
Merged

Update changelog of dockerfile to include Fab missing in Python 3.13#56176
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
potiuk:add-fab-missing-note-in-dockerfile-changelog

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Sep 28, 2025

Closes: #56123


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@potiuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

potiuk commented Sep 28, 2025

cc: @kaxil -> also noticed that 3.1.0 was changed to 3.2.0 accidentally in #55493 -> reverted it here.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 19fd4de into apache:main Sep 28, 2025
58 of 59 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the add-fab-missing-note-in-dockerfile-changelog branch September 28, 2025 07:18
@potiuk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

potiuk commented Sep 28, 2025

Merged - fixup to failed static check in #56178 (unrelated)

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2025
…Python 3.13 (#56176)

(cherry picked from commit 19fd4de)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Closes: #56123
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport successfully created: v3-1-test

Status Branch Result
v3-1-test PR Link

potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2025
…Python 3.13 (#56176) (#56179)

(cherry picked from commit 19fd4de)


Closes: #56123

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kaxil kaxil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Jarek

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes kind:documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing crucial packages in the slim-3.1.0-python3.13 image

3 participants