Skip to content

Conversation

@alan-agius4
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #14316

@alan-agius4 alan-agius4 added target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release and removed state: WIP labels Sep 23, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@filipesilva filipesilva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's happening 🎉

@vikerman
Copy link
Contributor

Will rxjs 6.5.3 be the minimum supported version for v9?

@alan-agius4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@vikerman, I am not sure about that.

//cc @IgorMinar

@vikerman vikerman merged commit ab5b190 into angular:master Sep 24, 2019
@alan-agius4 alan-agius4 deleted the remove_pure_getters branch September 25, 2019 07:27
cexbrayat added a commit to cexbrayat/angular-cli that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2019
PR angular#15607 removed the `_pure_getters` optimization as it no longer has effect on the framework size.
But it does have an effect on third party library.

For example a simple project using `@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap` goes from `444K` uncompressed with CLI `9.0.0-next.5` to `488K` with CLI `9.0.0-next.6` which introduced the removal.
vikerman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2019
PR #15607 removed the `_pure_getters` optimization as it no longer has effect on the framework size.
But it does have an effect on third party library.

For example a simple project using `@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap` goes from `444K` uncompressed with CLI `9.0.0-next.5` to `488K` with CLI `9.0.0-next.6` which introduced the removal.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 26, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Investigate why pure_getters had to be re-added

4 participants