Skip to content

docs: FANUC guide#464

Open
SprGrf wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
docs/fanuc-guide
Open

docs: FANUC guide#464
SprGrf wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
docs/fanuc-guide

Conversation

@SprGrf
Copy link
Contributor

@SprGrf SprGrf commented Feb 26, 2026

Description

Simple guide on how to control FANUC robots.

Review guidelines

Estimated Time of Review: 10 minutes

Checklist before merging:

  • Confirm that the relevant changelog(s) are up-to-date in case of any user-facing changes

@SprGrf SprGrf requested a review from yrh012 as a code owner February 26, 2026 17:51
@SprGrf SprGrf requested a review from domire8 February 26, 2026 17:51
Copy link
Member

@domire8 domire8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for getting this started, I edited a bit.

  • As mentioned, I would be in favor of removing the TP screenshots as we can't be sure they always look like that
  • I would also be in favor of not making the v4 version. If you want to keep it, you have to make just the one screenshot in v4 of core


:::warning

As stated in the official page, J568 and J570 are no longer required.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know how adopted these options were, I guess not a lot, but I would keep this part if they still appear somewhere and might confuse users on what to install exactly.

@SprGrf
Copy link
Contributor Author

SprGrf commented Mar 2, 2026

I would also be in favor of not making the v4 version

Agreed, my only concern is what happens when you don't have the v4 equivalent of a guide. I think it redirects you to the main page and that's a bit frustrating, not sure if there is a way to fix that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants