LocalCSE: Fix regression from #6587 by accumulating generativity#6591
Merged
kripken merged 2 commits intoWebAssembly:mainfrom May 15, 2024
Merged
LocalCSE: Fix regression from #6587 by accumulating generativity#6591kripken merged 2 commits intoWebAssembly:mainfrom
kripken merged 2 commits intoWebAssembly:mainfrom
Conversation
tlively
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#6587 was incorrect: It checked generativity early in an incremental manner, but
it did not accumulate that information as we do with hashes. As a result we
could end up optimizing something with a generative child, and sadly we lacked
testing for that case.
This adds incremental generativity computation alongside hashes. It also splits
out this check from isRelevant.
Also add a test for nested effects (as opposed to generativity), but that already
worked before this PR (as we compute effects and invalidation as we go, already).