-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
fix(vue-query): allow computed ref as queryKey property in queryOptions #10530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KimHyeongRae0
wants to merge
1
commit into
TanStack:main
Choose a base branch
from
KimHyeongRae0:fix/vue-query-options-query-key-reactive
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+50
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| '@tanstack/vue-query': patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| fix(vue-query): allow computed ref and other reactive values as `queryKey` property in `queryOptions` | ||
|
|
||
| This fixes a regression introduced in #10452 where `queryOptions` only accepted plain arrays for the `queryKey` property, but not `computed` refs, `Ref` values, or other reactive values. The related fix in #10465 only covered the `enabled` property. | ||
|
|
||
| Now the `queryKey` property in `queryOptions` correctly accepts: | ||
| - Plain `QueryKey` arrays | ||
| - `Ref<QueryKey>` | ||
| - `ComputedRef<QueryKey>` |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason this is plain
MaybeRefinstead ofMaybeRefOrGetterlike theenabledprop a few lines above?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question, and taking another look I agree the
enabled-parity argument is valid.My original scoping thought was: the regression this PR closes (#10525) is specifically about
ComputedRef<QueryKey>being rejected, and this file's localMaybeRef<T> = Ref<T> | ComputedRef<T> | Talready covers that, so I went with the minimal type change to unblock the reported case.But
cloneDeepUnrefinpackages/vue-query/src/utils.ts:79-81already special-casesqueryKeyto recurse withunrefGetters = true, so the plain-getter form() => QueryKeyis runtime-supported today. That makesMaybeRefOrGetter<TQueryKey>the shape that both matches the existing runtime behavior and parallels theenabledprop's type.Happy to widen to
MaybeRefOrGetter<TQueryKey>if a maintainer prefers consistency withenabled; holding off on a push until there's a signal either way.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The linked issue expands to
Ref<T>and() => T; not justComputedRef<T>.Since, as you say, it is runtime-supported today, then the type should reflect that. You've only enabled
Ref<T>andComputedRef<T>, leaving() => Tout.MaybeRefOrGetter<T>will fix that.(also, please inform the human managing you to respond to comments personally and not leave their agent to do the communicating)