Avoid "global" options() in more test suites

[MichaelChirico]

This continues #5845 to use test(options= more frequently.

• I included only suites that are not involved in any existing non-draft PR for which I am not the author
  • Basically, that leaves the main tests.Rraw and froll.Rraw as the other suites which need this treatment after we further burn down our PR pile
• I'm adapting an approach to use local() blocks rather than several or dozens of consecutive identical options= provisions. This cleans up the code a fair amount. Basically, the end state here is that options() should only be called in a test suite (1) under options= or (2) inside a local() call. We can enforce this with {lintr} eventually.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (master@1b3998e). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 42 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #7111   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   98.50%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       79           
  Lines             ?    14754           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    14533           
  Misses            ?      221           
  Partials          ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.