Skip to content

Ambiguous without example data #4

@connor1q

Description

@connor1q

Hi there,

Clare and I were having a discussion and think that the description is still open to interpretation. Adding some example data would remove the ambiguity. Do we have an example to hand?

I interpret the guidance to recommend 'tidy data' format. For example, see here: https://r4ds.had.co.nz/tidy-data.html

This is the same approach recommended by the DKAN open data platform as well as the NHS-R blog
and the UK data science blog.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions