Conversation
|
@kemccusker This is marked as "Draft" in the title. Is this ready to review and merge or is another component missing from this PR? |
Oops sorry @brews, removed the Draft. It's ready for review. |
brews
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! I think this can merge whenever you're ready, @kemccusker.
|
Should note this PR has breaking changes to That's fine but worth mentioning in case someone wants to know why their code no longer works. |
|
Thanks for listing the breaking changes, @brews. @davidrzhdu is handling the I want to confirm from @JMGilbert that we no longer need |
I am pretty sure that we no longer use this argument or need it at all. |
|
For future reference: When calculating country specific SCGHGs, discounting using only the future socioeconomics of that country would be improper. To obtain the proper SCGHG, calculate discount factors using global consumption no pulse, then discount the marginal damages from that country and sum across years. |
|
I'm going to update the CHANGELOG manually after this merges as time is tight on this. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.