Add DSCIM mkdocs documentation page

[JMGilbert]

Documentation was built based on the dodola repository. The current documentation for dscim can be viewed here: https://jmgilbert.github.io/dscim/.

This page at some point could use a revamp of the readme and some of the docstrings. I think it makes more sense to have that be a separate PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.63%. Comparing base (d4ab702) to head (339ed7a).

❗ Current head 339ed7a differs from pull request most recent head 416aa5b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 416aa5b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #254   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.63%   65.63%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1845     1845           
=======================================
  Hits         1211     1211           
  Misses        634      634           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[brews]

Nice. Thanks for this, @JMGilbert . I think you're giving this a pretty good starting point, like you said. We can definitely build off of this.

There was some discussion (@kemccusker) about trying to deploy this to readthedocs, and seeing how that feels. There are good arguments for that. But, given how busy we've been and it has taken 3 weeks to review this, I think it's okay to start this on Github Pages (which is simpler). We can test the waters with mkdocs on readthedocs in a later PR.

Curious to hear others opinions, especially if there is disagreement. I think it's okay to merge this as is. I'm happy to setup the Github Pages settings when/if we're ready.

[kemccusker]

@brews @JMGilbert I'm totally down with starting these docs on GitHub pages. I'd be happy for you to take that on, Brewster. Thanks both!